Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.


↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,15] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
ZIP(X1, mark(X2)) → ZIP(X1, X2)
TAKE(X1, active(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
TAIL(active(X)) → TAIL(X)
MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → CONS(X, cons(X, repItems(XS)))
ACTIVE(oddNs) → MARK(incr(pairNs))
INCR(active(X)) → INCR(X)
ACTIVE(repItems(nil)) → MARK(nil)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → TAKE(mark(X1), mark(X2))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → INCR(XS)
PAIR(X1, active(X2)) → PAIR(X1, X2)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)
MARK(tail(X)) → TAIL(mark(X))
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → REPITEMS(XS)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(mark(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(take(0, XS)) → MARK(nil)
MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
TAKE(active(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → PAIR(X, Y)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → TAKE(N, XS)
ACTIVE(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → ZIP(XS, YS)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ZIP(X1, active(X2)) → ZIP(X1, X2)
TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → CONS(s(X), incr(XS))
ZIP(mark(X1), X2) → ZIP(X1, X2)
TAKE(mark(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
PAIR(X1, mark(X2)) → PAIR(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ZIP(active(X1), X2) → ZIP(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(incr(X)) → INCR(mark(X))
PAIR(mark(X1), X2) → PAIR(X1, X2)
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → MARK(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(repItems(X)) → REPITEMS(mark(X))
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → S(X)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
ACTIVE(pairNs) → INCR(oddNs)
ACTIVE(pairNs) → CONS(0, incr(oddNs))
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → CONS(X, take(N, XS))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → CONS(X, repItems(XS))
REPITEMS(mark(X)) → REPITEMS(X)
ACTIVE(zip(X, nil)) → MARK(nil)
ACTIVE(zip(nil, XS)) → MARK(nil)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → ZIP(mark(X1), mark(X2))
PAIR(active(X1), X2) → PAIR(X1, X2)
TAKE(X1, mark(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
ACTIVE(oddNs) → INCR(pairNs)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → PAIR(mark(X1), mark(X2))
ACTIVE(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → CONS(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS))
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
REPITEMS(active(X)) → REPITEMS(X)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
ACTIVE(tail(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(XS)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
ZIP(X1, mark(X2)) → ZIP(X1, X2)
TAKE(X1, active(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
TAIL(active(X)) → TAIL(X)
MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → CONS(X, cons(X, repItems(XS)))
ACTIVE(oddNs) → MARK(incr(pairNs))
INCR(active(X)) → INCR(X)
ACTIVE(repItems(nil)) → MARK(nil)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → TAKE(mark(X1), mark(X2))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → INCR(XS)
PAIR(X1, active(X2)) → PAIR(X1, X2)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)
MARK(tail(X)) → TAIL(mark(X))
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → REPITEMS(XS)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(mark(X1), X2)
ACTIVE(take(0, XS)) → MARK(nil)
MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
TAKE(active(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → PAIR(X, Y)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → TAKE(N, XS)
ACTIVE(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → ZIP(XS, YS)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ZIP(X1, active(X2)) → ZIP(X1, X2)
TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → CONS(s(X), incr(XS))
ZIP(mark(X1), X2) → ZIP(X1, X2)
TAKE(mark(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
PAIR(X1, mark(X2)) → PAIR(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ZIP(active(X1), X2) → ZIP(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(incr(X)) → INCR(mark(X))
PAIR(mark(X1), X2) → PAIR(X1, X2)
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → MARK(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
MARK(repItems(X)) → REPITEMS(mark(X))
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → S(X)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
MARK(s(X)) → S(mark(X))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
ACTIVE(pairNs) → INCR(oddNs)
ACTIVE(pairNs) → CONS(0, incr(oddNs))
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → CONS(X, take(N, XS))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → CONS(X, repItems(XS))
REPITEMS(mark(X)) → REPITEMS(X)
ACTIVE(zip(X, nil)) → MARK(nil)
ACTIVE(zip(nil, XS)) → MARK(nil)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → ZIP(mark(X1), mark(X2))
PAIR(active(X1), X2) → PAIR(X1, X2)
TAKE(X1, mark(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
ACTIVE(oddNs) → INCR(pairNs)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → PAIR(mark(X1), mark(X2))
ACTIVE(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → CONS(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS))
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(0) → ACTIVE(0)
REPITEMS(active(X)) → REPITEMS(X)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(nil) → ACTIVE(nil)
ACTIVE(tail(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(XS)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 9 SCCs with 28 less nodes.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

REPITEMS(mark(X)) → REPITEMS(X)
REPITEMS(active(X)) → REPITEMS(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


REPITEMS(mark(X)) → REPITEMS(X)
REPITEMS(active(X)) → REPITEMS(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 1/2 + (3/2)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 9/4 + x_1   
POL(REPITEMS(x1)) = (1/2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TAIL(active(X)) → TAIL(X)
TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


TAIL(active(X)) → TAIL(X)
TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 1/2 + (3/2)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 9/4 + x_1   
POL(TAIL(x1)) = (1/2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PAIR(X1, active(X2)) → PAIR(X1, X2)
PAIR(mark(X1), X2) → PAIR(X1, X2)
PAIR(X1, mark(X2)) → PAIR(X1, X2)
PAIR(active(X1), X2) → PAIR(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PAIR(X1, active(X2)) → PAIR(X1, X2)
PAIR(X1, mark(X2)) → PAIR(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

PAIR(mark(X1), X2) → PAIR(X1, X2)
PAIR(active(X1), X2) → PAIR(X1, X2)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 4 + (4)x_1   
POL(PAIR(x1, x2)) = (4)x_2   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1/4 + (3/2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PAIR(mark(X1), X2) → PAIR(X1, X2)
PAIR(active(X1), X2) → PAIR(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


PAIR(mark(X1), X2) → PAIR(X1, X2)
PAIR(active(X1), X2) → PAIR(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 9/4 + x_1   
POL(PAIR(x1, x2)) = (1/2)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1/2 + (3/2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ZIP(mark(X1), X2) → ZIP(X1, X2)
ZIP(X1, mark(X2)) → ZIP(X1, X2)
ZIP(X1, active(X2)) → ZIP(X1, X2)
ZIP(active(X1), X2) → ZIP(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ZIP(mark(X1), X2) → ZIP(X1, X2)
ZIP(X1, mark(X2)) → ZIP(X1, X2)
ZIP(X1, active(X2)) → ZIP(X1, X2)
ZIP(active(X1), X2) → ZIP(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 7/4 + x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 13/4 + (2)x_1   
POL(ZIP(x1, x2)) = (1/2)x_1 + (1/4)x_2   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 7/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TAKE(X1, active(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(active(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(mark(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(X1, mark(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


TAKE(X1, active(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(active(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(mark(X1), X2) → TAKE(X1, X2)
TAKE(X1, mark(X2)) → TAKE(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(TAKE(x1, x2)) = (1/4)x_1 + (1/2)x_2   
POL(active(x1)) = 13/4 + (2)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 1/4 + (2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


S(mark(X)) → S(X)
S(active(X)) → S(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 1/2 + (3/2)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 9/4 + x_1   
POL(S(x1)) = (1/2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)
INCR(active(X)) → INCR(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)
INCR(active(X)) → INCR(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 1/2 + (3/2)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 9/4 + x_1   
POL(INCR(x1)) = (1/2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


CONS(X1, active(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(active(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(active(x1)) = 3/2 + x_1   
POL(CONS(x1, x2)) = (3/2)x_1 + (4)x_2   
POL(mark(x1)) = (2)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 9/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(X1, mark(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(CONS(x1, x2)) = (3)x_1 + (1/2)x_2   
POL(mark(x1)) = 4 + (9/4)x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 2.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(oddNs) → MARK(incr(pairNs))
ACTIVE(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → MARK(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
ACTIVE(tail(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(XS)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(s(X)) → ACTIVE(s(mark(X)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(cons(mark(X1), X2))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(oddNs) → MARK(incr(pairNs))
ACTIVE(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → MARK(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
ACTIVE(tail(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(XS)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(zip(x1, x2)) = 1/2   
POL(tail(x1)) = 1/2   
POL(oddNs) = 1/2   
POL(mark(x1)) = 0   
POL(take(x1, x2)) = 1/2   
POL(0) = 1/4   
POL(repItems(x1)) = 1/2   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = 2 + (4)x_1   
POL(active(x1)) = 1/4 + (3/4)x_1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(MARK(x1)) = 4   
POL(incr(x1)) = 1/2   
POL(pair(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(pairNs) = 1/2   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
POL(nil) = 9/4   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 2.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(oddNs) → MARK(incr(pairNs))
ACTIVE(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → MARK(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
ACTIVE(tail(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(XS)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → MARK(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(pair(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(oddNs) → MARK(incr(pairNs))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
ACTIVE(tail(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(XS)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(zip(x1, x2)) = 4 + x_1 + (4)x_2   
POL(tail(x1)) = (3)x_1   
POL(oddNs) = 0   
POL(mark(x1)) = x_1   
POL(take(x1, x2)) = (2)x_1 + (2)x_2   
POL(0) = 0   
POL(repItems(x1)) = (4)x_1   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = (1/4)x_1   
POL(active(x1)) = x_1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = (2)x_1 + (1/2)x_2   
POL(MARK(x1)) = (1/4)x_1   
POL(incr(x1)) = (4)x_1   
POL(pair(x1, x2)) = 1/4 + x_1 + (4)x_2   
POL(pairNs) = 0   
POL(s(x1)) = x_1   
POL(nil) = 0   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/16.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
mark(0) → active(0)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
mark(nil) → active(nil)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(oddNs) → MARK(incr(pairNs))
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
ACTIVE(tail(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(XS)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(tail(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(tail(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(XS)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(oddNs) → MARK(incr(pairNs))
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(zip(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(tail(x1)) = 2 + (4)x_1   
POL(oddNs) = 0   
POL(mark(x1)) = x_1   
POL(take(x1, x2)) = x_1 + x_2   
POL(repItems(x1)) = (2)x_1   
POL(0) = 0   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = (1/4)x_1   
POL(active(x1)) = x_1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = (4)x_1 + (1/2)x_2   
POL(MARK(x1)) = (1/4)x_1   
POL(incr(x1)) = (5/4)x_1   
POL(pair(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(pairNs) = 0   
POL(s(x1)) = x_1   
POL(nil) = 0   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/2.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

mark(nil) → active(nil)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
mark(0) → active(0)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(oddNs) → MARK(incr(pairNs))
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(zip(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(oddNs) → MARK(incr(pairNs))
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(zip(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(tail(x1)) = 1   
POL(oddNs) = 1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 0   
POL(take(x1, x2)) = 1   
POL(repItems(x1)) = 1   
POL(0) = 7/2   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = x_1   
POL(active(x1)) = 5/4   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(MARK(x1)) = 1   
POL(incr(x1)) = 1   
POL(pair(x1, x2)) = 13/4 + (4)x_1 + (1/4)x_2   
POL(pairNs) = 1   
POL(s(x1)) = 4 + (4)x_1   
POL(nil) = 5/4   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(oddNs) → MARK(incr(pairNs))
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(tail(mark(X)))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(oddNs) → MARK(incr(pairNs))
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(zip(x1, x2)) = 5/4 + (5/4)x_1 + (1/2)x_2   
POL(tail(x1)) = 0   
POL(oddNs) = 1/4   
POL(mark(x1)) = 0   
POL(take(x1, x2)) = 1/4   
POL(repItems(x1)) = 1/4   
POL(0) = 4   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = (2)x_1   
POL(active(x1)) = 3/4   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = (2)x_1   
POL(MARK(x1)) = 1/2   
POL(incr(x1)) = 1/4   
POL(pair(x1, x2)) = 7/2 + (5/4)x_1 + (4)x_2   
POL(pairNs) = 1/4   
POL(s(x1)) = 0   
POL(nil) = 5/4   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/2.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                              ↳ QDP
                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(oddNs) → MARK(incr(pairNs))
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X2)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(oddNs) → MARK(incr(pairNs))
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(zip(x1, x2)) = (3/2)x_1   
POL(tail(x1)) = (4)x_1   
POL(oddNs) = 0   
POL(mark(x1)) = x_1   
POL(take(x1, x2)) = 1 + (2)x_1 + (4)x_2   
POL(repItems(x1)) = (2)x_1   
POL(0) = 0   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = (1/4)x_1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = (4)x_1 + x_2   
POL(active(x1)) = x_1   
POL(MARK(x1)) = (1/4)x_1   
POL(incr(x1)) = (2)x_1   
POL(pair(x1, x2)) = (1/4)x_1   
POL(pairNs) = 0   
POL(s(x1)) = (2)x_1   
POL(nil) = 0   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

mark(nil) → active(nil)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
mark(0) → active(0)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                              ↳ QDP
                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                  ↳ QDP
                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(oddNs) → MARK(incr(pairNs))
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
MARK(incr(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(oddNs) → MARK(incr(pairNs))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(zip(x1, x2)) = 2 + (1/4)x_1   
POL(tail(x1)) = 1/4 + (4)x_1   
POL(oddNs) = 7/2   
POL(mark(x1)) = x_1   
POL(take(x1, x2)) = (4)x_2   
POL(repItems(x1)) = (5/4)x_1   
POL(0) = 0   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = 4 + (4)x_1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = (4)x_1 + (1/4)x_2   
POL(active(x1)) = x_1   
POL(MARK(x1)) = 4 + (4)x_1   
POL(incr(x1)) = 1/2 + x_1   
POL(pair(x1, x2)) = 1/4   
POL(pairNs) = 1   
POL(s(x1)) = x_1   
POL(nil) = 0   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 3/2.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

mark(nil) → active(nil)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
mark(0) → active(0)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                              ↳ QDP
                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                  ↳ QDP
                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                      ↳ QDP
                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(oddNs) → ACTIVE(oddNs)
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                              ↳ QDP
                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                  ↳ QDP
                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                      ↳ QDP
                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                          ↳ QDP
                                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(incr(mark(X)))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(zip(x1, x2)) = 11/4 + (3/4)x_1 + x_2   
POL(tail(x1)) = 13/4 + (9/4)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 2   
POL(oddNs) = 3/4   
POL(take(x1, x2)) = 1/4   
POL(repItems(x1)) = 1/4   
POL(0) = 9/4   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = (4)x_1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(active(x1)) = 0   
POL(MARK(x1)) = 1   
POL(incr(x1)) = 0   
POL(pair(x1, x2)) = 4 + (7/2)x_1 + (3)x_2   
POL(pairNs) = 1/4   
POL(s(x1)) = x_1   
POL(nil) = 0   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                              ↳ QDP
                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                  ↳ QDP
                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                      ↳ QDP
                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                          ↳ QDP
                                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                              ↳ QDP
                                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
MARK(repItems(X)) → MARK(X)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(zip(x1, x2)) = 13/4 + (2)x_2   
POL(tail(x1)) = 2 + (4)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = x_1   
POL(oddNs) = 0   
POL(take(x1, x2)) = (2)x_2   
POL(repItems(x1)) = 1 + (4)x_1   
POL(0) = 0   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = (1/2)x_1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = x_1 + (1/4)x_2   
POL(active(x1)) = x_1   
POL(MARK(x1)) = (1/2)x_1   
POL(incr(x1)) = (2)x_1   
POL(pair(x1, x2)) = (1/2)x_2   
POL(pairNs) = 0   
POL(s(x1)) = (5/4)x_1   
POL(nil) = 0   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 15/32.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

mark(nil) → active(nil)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
mark(0) → active(0)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                              ↳ QDP
                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                  ↳ QDP
                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                      ↳ QDP
                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                          ↳ QDP
                                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                              ↳ QDP
                                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                  ↳ QDP
                                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(repItems(X)) → ACTIVE(repItems(mark(X)))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(zip(x1, x2)) = 13/4 + (11/4)x_1 + (13/4)x_2   
POL(tail(x1)) = 1/4 + (2)x_1   
POL(mark(x1)) = 0   
POL(oddNs) = 4   
POL(take(x1, x2)) = 1/4   
POL(repItems(x1)) = 0   
POL(0) = 11/4   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = (4)x_1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = 0   
POL(active(x1)) = 4   
POL(MARK(x1)) = 1   
POL(incr(x1)) = 7/2   
POL(pair(x1, x2)) = 1/4 + (2)x_1 + (3)x_2   
POL(pairNs) = 1/4   
POL(s(x1)) = (1/4)x_1   
POL(nil) = 2   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                              ↳ QDP
                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                  ↳ QDP
                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                      ↳ QDP
                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                          ↳ QDP
                                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                              ↳ QDP
                                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                  ↳ QDP
                                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                      ↳ QDP
                                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → MARK(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(zip(x1, x2)) = 5/2 + (5/2)x_2   
POL(tail(x1)) = 2 + (2)x_1   
POL(oddNs) = 0   
POL(mark(x1)) = x_1   
POL(take(x1, x2)) = 1/2 + x_2   
POL(repItems(x1)) = (3/2)x_1   
POL(0) = 0   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = 15/4 + (1/2)x_1   
POL(cons(x1, x2)) = (2)x_1 + (1/2)x_2   
POL(active(x1)) = x_1   
POL(MARK(x1)) = 15/4 + (1/2)x_1   
POL(incr(x1)) = x_1   
POL(pair(x1, x2)) = (5/2)x_2   
POL(pairNs) = 0   
POL(s(x1)) = x_1   
POL(nil) = 0   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/8.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:

mark(nil) → active(nil)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
mark(0) → active(0)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                              ↳ QDP
                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                  ↳ QDP
                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                      ↳ QDP
                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                          ↳ QDP
                                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                              ↳ QDP
                                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                  ↳ QDP
                                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                      ↳ QDP
                                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                          ↳ QDP
                                                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
MARK(take(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                              ↳ QDP
                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                  ↳ QDP
                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                      ↳ QDP
                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                          ↳ QDP
                                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                              ↳ QDP
                                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                  ↳ QDP
                                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                      ↳ QDP
                                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                          ↳ QDP
                                                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                                              ↳ QDP
                                                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


ACTIVE(pairNs) → MARK(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
MARK(pairNs) → ACTIVE(pairNs)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(cons(x1, x2)) = (4)x_1 + (1/4)x_2   
POL(MARK(x1)) = (2)x_1   
POL(incr(x1)) = 4 + (1/4)x_1   
POL(oddNs) = 1/4   
POL(s(x1)) = (2)x_1   
POL(pairNs) = 4   
POL(0) = 0   
POL(ACTIVE(x1)) = 15/4   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 55/32.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                              ↳ QDP
                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                  ↳ QDP
                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                      ↳ QDP
                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                          ↳ QDP
                                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                              ↳ QDP
                                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                  ↳ QDP
                                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                      ↳ QDP
                                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                          ↳ QDP
                                                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                                              ↳ QDP
                                                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                                  ↳ QDP
                                                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


MARK(s(X)) → MARK(X)
MARK(cons(X1, X2)) → MARK(X1)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25,35]:

POL(cons(x1, x2)) = 1/2 + (3/2)x_1   
POL(MARK(x1)) = (1/2)x_1   
POL(s(x1)) = 9/4 + x_1   
The value of delta used in the strict ordering is 1/4.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                      ↳ QDP
                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                          ↳ QDP
                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                              ↳ QDP
                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                  ↳ QDP
                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                      ↳ QDP
                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                          ↳ QDP
                                            ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                              ↳ QDP
                                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                  ↳ QDP
                                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                      ↳ QDP
                                                        ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                          ↳ QDP
                                                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof
                                                              ↳ QDP
                                                                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                                  ↳ QDP
                                                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof
                                                                      ↳ QDP
                                                                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(pairNs) → mark(cons(0, incr(oddNs)))
active(oddNs) → mark(incr(pairNs))
active(incr(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(XS)))
active(take(0, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(take(s(N), cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, take(N, XS)))
active(zip(nil, XS)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(X, nil)) → mark(nil)
active(zip(cons(X, XS), cons(Y, YS))) → mark(cons(pair(X, Y), zip(XS, YS)))
active(tail(cons(X, XS))) → mark(XS)
active(repItems(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(repItems(cons(X, XS))) → mark(cons(X, cons(X, repItems(XS))))
mark(pairNs) → active(pairNs)
mark(cons(X1, X2)) → active(cons(mark(X1), X2))
mark(0) → active(0)
mark(incr(X)) → active(incr(mark(X)))
mark(oddNs) → active(oddNs)
mark(s(X)) → active(s(mark(X)))
mark(take(X1, X2)) → active(take(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(nil) → active(nil)
mark(zip(X1, X2)) → active(zip(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(pair(X1, X2)) → active(pair(mark(X1), mark(X2)))
mark(tail(X)) → active(tail(mark(X)))
mark(repItems(X)) → active(repItems(mark(X)))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, mark(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(active(X1), X2) → cons(X1, X2)
cons(X1, active(X2)) → cons(X1, X2)
incr(mark(X)) → incr(X)
incr(active(X)) → incr(X)
s(mark(X)) → s(X)
s(active(X)) → s(X)
take(mark(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, mark(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
take(active(X1), X2) → take(X1, X2)
take(X1, active(X2)) → take(X1, X2)
zip(mark(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, mark(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(active(X1), X2) → zip(X1, X2)
zip(X1, active(X2)) → zip(X1, X2)
pair(mark(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, mark(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(active(X1), X2) → pair(X1, X2)
pair(X1, active(X2)) → pair(X1, X2)
tail(mark(X)) → tail(X)
tail(active(X)) → tail(X)
repItems(mark(X)) → repItems(X)
repItems(active(X)) → repItems(X)

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.